THANK YOU to the community members who attended the prop 39 charter school board meeting last night.
At the board meeting, charter leaders made it crystal clear that they will sue RVSD if they don't get what they want.
For those who were not able to attend, here is a brief recap:Prop 39 and enrollment:
• The charter discussed the prop 39 letter from RVSD. Kristi Kimball stated that she thought it was “pretty shocking” that the district did not account for any specialized space. The specialized space is what the charter is basing its space allocation argument on.
• The board stated that that RVSD provides art and music. The “District’s fingerprints are all over this. Those teachers are paid and tenured.” The charter is trying to prove that these specialized classrooms are provided to the student population by the district and should have been allocated or included in the space given.
• The charter discussed the PRAs submitted to RVSD. They only got 1/3 back of what they requested. Conn Hickey said it will take another 2 weeks to get the additional info from the PRA to come back from the district.
• Mr. Hickey spoke about a letter that will be submitted to the district to ask for resolution as they are under a time crunch. If the district does not provide them additional classrooms, the litigious prop 39 charter, will once again, sue our school district.
• Comments made by the charter school leaders included, “We can’t wait” (referring to the back and forth legal Prop 39 steps deadlines) as “March is the time to enroll” and it is “not easy to get a court date”. Mr. Hickey stated that he is “pretty confident that if it gets in front of a judge they will side with us”.
• It should be noted that the charter wants to sue in March, before final demand offers are due to be completed under the Prop 39 process. All because they see the urgency, and parents make decisions about schools in March. So once again, like when they were MAP, they are walking away from the process that they invoked, to go nuclear and file a lawsuit. This is the same behavior exhibited by the charter leaders in 2014 when they walked away from mediation and filed for charter.
• The prop 39 charter stated that there are allegedly 25 TK/K students on the waitlist for this year (2017/2018) from WISE/Heartwood. They want to open the eighth classroom to accommodate this group. If the charter school adds the classroom and gets that attendance, the charter alleges that it will meet the 165 students per their original application and will avoid the material revision and fees due to the district. However, this is not accurate. The fines are levied on low numbers of in district children, not the total number of children enrolled.
• Although the increased enrollment may allow the charter school to avoid a material revision, they are still required to revise the petition prior to allowing the founders/teachers and siblings to have priority.
• RVC is confident that the July material revision will allow for the carve outs for siblings and children of staff/founders to occur. There was further discussion about the sibling policy. The majority of in district siblings will have priority, but not the out of district.
• Last night, rather than “hold seats’ for these illegally prioritized applicants, the charter board voted to reduce the number of seats available in the lottery. This is a violation of the enrollment policies in the approved charter petition and the SBE should do their job and not allow RVC to enroll any children outside of the lottery process.
• The return of the White Hill library was mentioned in passing. The agreement is in their hands for signature. But they are concerned that, should they add the 7th class - and maybe the 8th class - in this school year, that they will need all the space that is available to them. The internal battle is whether they make a sacrifice in space in 2017-2018 to create an advantage for the 2018-2019 school year.
• Once again, the charter board did not provide any update on its progress towards finding $250,000 in grant funding, with $150,000 needed in March.
a : disputatious, contentious
b : prone to engage in lawsuits
As it becomes clear that RVC will be suing RVSD if they don't get what they want, we thought we would remind our supporters of RVC's own words.
Ross Valley Charter will be suing our school district for the second time. The charter is certainly "prone to engage in lawsuits".